Big short investor Steve Eisman sold Google because the entire market was now a “one trade”


Steve Eisman has sold his long-time position at Google to reduce his exposure to artificial intelligence (AI). The investor who shorted the housing market in 2008 is now holding cash, warning that the entire market has become one bet on artificial intelligence.

He did not purchase a replacement. Defensive stocks won’t work, Eisman says, because investors either want AI or they don’t want any.

Eisman sold Google near its record high

Speaking on CNBC’s Squawk Box, Neuberger Berman’s former portfolio manager described the exit as deliberate. He built his reputation shorting subprime mortgages at FrontPoint Partners.

“I sold my Google account a couple of months ago. I’ve owned Google. I can’t even tell you how long I’ve owned Google, but I felt like I wanted to reduce my exposure to AI,” Eisman said.

The timing looks good so far. Alphabet peaked at $408.61 on May 18, its record high. The stock closed at $319.74 on July 24. This represents a decline of approximately 20% in about two months.

Alphabet (Google) stock performance. Source: Trading View
Alphabet (Google) stock performance. source: TradingView

One session caused a lot of damage. Alphabet stock fell 7.1% on July 23The day after second quarter earnings. The company had just raised its 2026 capital spending guidance to a range of $195 billion to $205 billion.

Eisman did not turn to safety. He explained why in one line.

“People either want to buy AI or they don’t want to buy AI, but they don’t want to switch from buying Clorox,” he said.

Cash remains unobligated. “I’m just sitting… I have money,” he said. He does not expect the controversy over artificial intelligence to settle “within the next two weeks.”

Why does Eisman say the market is “one trade”

His concern is focus, not evaluation.

“It’s one trade. It’s literally one trade,” Eisman said.

Then show the math on a standard portfolio.

“Even people who think they are diversified because they own 60% stocks and 40% bonds miss the fact that they are not actually diversified… More than 50%… is tied to technology and AI. Of the 40% of bonds, most of the new bond issues are tied to AI,” he said.

Do Eisman’s numbers hold up?

Half of the stocks do this on a large scale. Information technology accounted for 37.19% of the S&P 500 on July 24, and communications services added 9.34%. That is 46.5% combined.

Add Amazon and Tesla, which are on the consumer discretionary list, and the number reaches 51.5%. So “more than 50%” works, but only by a generous definition.

The focus itself is not in doubt. The 10 largest components make up 36.85% of the index.

Half bonds are weaker. High technology accounted for 14.2% of US corporate bond issuances in the second quarter, according to characteristics. Financial services advanced 46.4%. AI is not “most” of the new releases.

His basic point still stands, and the official data makes it even better. Bank of England I mentioned This month, five AI supercaps held just 3% of US investment-grade debt due at the end of 2025, yet they accounted for more than 15% of this year’s issuance by early May.

The shift in high yield has become sharper. These issuers accounted for 41% of non-refinancing US high-yield issues this year, out of an index weight of 1%.

AI Hyperscaler Bond Sales Since October 2025. Source: BeInCrypto
AI Hyperscaler Bond Sales Since October 2025. Source: BeInCrypto

Transaction sizes explain speed. Amazon priced $37 billion worth of notes on March 10, the largest of these deals, according to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Deposit. Meta raised $30 billion last October and another $25 billion in April.

One caveat sits in the cards. The state revenues provided go to general corporate purposes, so none of this debt is officially allocated to AI.

Is a correction coming if AI fails?

When asked what would happen if AI failed commercially, Eisman was blunt. “I think we have a big correction,” he said. He won’t size it up.

He added: “What scares me is that this is all one business. So it better work.”

Central banks have taught the same tube. The Bank for International Settlements warned in June that fixed income is “one obvious vulnerability” if big expansionists slow capital spending.

What does it mean for cryptocurrencies

Cryptocurrencies fall into the same risk group. Bitcoin (BTC) is trading near $64,980 and is down nearly 45% over the past year.

The link appeared in June, when A The sell-off of major technology companies sent Bitcoin lower. Its retail flows Preferred Semiconductor ETFs on crypto money this year.

Others see the same overlap. Chinese hedge funds started AI trimming winners in visual rotationOne bubble forecaster warned in 2008 of a 70% decline.

Where the thesis breaks down

Eisman is not calling for collapse. He said he would not sell this market, and he expects the technology to succeed.

“It will be… a really good thing,” he said. “That doesn’t mean everyone succeeds.”

This gap determines the risks. AI can succeed as a technology while the commerce built around it is still in decline.

The near term will quickly test it. Microsoft and Meta reported earnings on July 29, followed by Amazon on July 30. Three more capital expenditure updates arrive within 72 hours.

this post Big short investor Steve Eisman sold Google because the entire market was now a “one trade” appeared first on BeInCrypto.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *