
short
- In addition to the high-profile $290 million Kelp DAO hack, Wall Street firms are concerned about their fiduciary responsibility to prevent state-sponsored bad actors from interacting with their systems.
- Yuval Rose, of Digital Asset, highlighted the “guardrail” design of the Canton Network as a solution to hacking, a feature that remains a point of contention among crypto proponents.
- Rose believes Arbitrum’s 12-member security board did “no bad thing” by freezing funds left exposed by Kelp DAO attackers.
North Korea-linked hacking groups sent shivers down the spine of the encrypted encryption amidst them Increasing losses to Decentralized finance projects, but these concerns have grown just as much on Wall Street, according to Digital Asset co-founder and CEO Yuval Rose.
Even before the $290 million Kelp DAO hack Confidence in DeFi has been shaken Rose said last month Decryption The team behind Canton – a public, permissioned blockchain – has answered questions from financial institutions about threats coming from the so-called hermit kingdom. North Korean hackers have stolen Over $6 billion worth of cryptocurrencies Since 2017, according to a report by TRM Labs.
“They have to make sure bad actors can’t manipulate their systems,” he said. “That is what they are responsible for through their fiduciary duty as a traditional organization.”
Because Canton allows participants to implement guardrails for subnets they create or digital assets they issue, Rose is confident that North Korea-linked hacking groups will have difficulty operating within Canton projects that take advantage of those risk protections. This is despite DeFi attackers evolving from simple phishing attempts to… Infiltration campaigns lasted for months Aiming to gain privileged access to protocols.
Since the network debuted in 2024, crypto proponents have done just that angry By Canton’s design, arguing that it is not a “true” blockchain network partly because participants can limit users’ control; However, allegations of centralization have recently emerged within DeFi more broadly.
when resolutionThe Security Council consists of 12 members Move To freeze $71 million in funds that Kelp DAO attackers left exposed on the network Ethereum Layer 2 scaling networkFor example, debate ensued over whether the move threatens the fundamental permissionless nature of decentralized finance.
“No one should say this is a bad thing,” Rose said. “One of the interesting things to me about DeFi is that people want all the freedom in the world without any of the risks.”
Rose acknowledged that Canton participants could create environments that reflect unfettered access to networks such as Ethereum and SolanaBut he is betting that safety standards will be on the table for most applications targeting consumers.
However, he stressed that projects should choose to use these features, and said that he does not generally consider Canton a “silver” solution to DeFi problems. But the ability to limit who can access Canton applications and keep potential threats at bay seems to be the main draw for organizations.
For stablecoin issuers like Tether and Circle, Rooz said this dynamic is already on display.
After North Korea-linked attackers used a USDC issuer’s infrastructure to transfer funds, Circle He said Stablecoins will not be secured without a court order. Meanwhile, Tether has been working with authorities to Freeze funds Allegedly linked to illicit financing.
Ultimately, the tension between absolute decentralization and safety shows no signs of abating. In a world where a single exploit can wreak havoc, Rose suggested that the ability to flip the switch on bad actors will go from a controversial feature to the go-to standard.
Editor’s Note: This story was updated after publication to update the headline and main image, and add additional context to the story from Rose’s interview, to clarify that projects must provide safeguards.
Daily debriefing Newsletter
Start each day with the latest news, plus original features, podcasts, videos and more.





