Tldr:
- Tenbin Labs has deprecated LayerZero following an internal audit resulting from recent security incidents across the chain.
- Chainlink CCIP secures each bridge pass through 16 independent node operators and security auditors for redundant validation.
- CCIP’s SOC 2 Type 2 certification meets enterprise security standards without adding additional burden to the Tenbin team.
- Tenbin’s tokenized assets tGLD, tMXN, and tBRL are now scaling cross-chain under the unified Chainlink data standard.
Tenpin Laboratories officially LayerZero was deprecated and migrated to Chainlink Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) as the sole bridge infrastructure.
The decision follows an internal security audit resulting from recent cross-chain incidents across the wider industry.
The migration covers all of Tenbin’s real-world token assets, including tGLD, tMXN, and tBRL. This move enables Tenbin to securely expand the distribution of its assets across multiple blockchain networks.
Chainlink CCIP replaces LayerZero in all Tenbin asset lanes
Tenbin Labs has conducted a security review of its system Cross-chain infrastructure After noting the weaknesses revealed by recent industry incidents.
The audit concluded that its previous solution, LayerZero, no longer met the minimum security required for real tokenized assets. As a result, Tenbin has officially deprecated LayerZero in favor of Chainlink CCIP.
Chainlink CCIP works with 16 independent node operators and security auditors for each bridge lane. Each operator runs full blockchain nodes or connects to multiple professional RPC providers.
This setup ensures frequent validation of every cross-chain transaction processed through Tenbin’s infrastructure.
The protocol also holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification, meeting security standards set by the discipline Financial institutions.
For an asset issuer dealing with commodities and tokens, this certification carries practical weight. It takes the burden of custom security engineering off the Tenbin team.
Tenbin Labs shared their reasons directly on X. On May 18, 2026, the team posted: “Cross-chain infrastructure needs dedicated and standardized security standards that do not impose additional burdens on the project team.” The post links to a detailed breakdown of the rationale for CCIP migration.
Built-in risk controls drive Tenbin’s decision on infrastructure
One of the main factors in choosing Chainlink CCIP Its original structure was to manage risk. The protocol has built-in rate limits that act as circuit breakers during worst-case scenarios.
These controls help contain potential infections without requiring manual intervention from the Tenbin team.
Chainlink has also appointed dedicated risk management and monitoring teams to support the Tenbin integration. This added layer of operational support reduces the security load that would otherwise fall on the asset issuer. For a platform that manages real-world tokenized assets, this distinction is operationally relevant.
Tenbin co-founder and CEO Yuki Yominaga addressed the issue of immigration directly: “Recent events in our space have made it abundantly clear that bridging protocols carry a serious responsibility.”
Yuminaga noted that any compromise in cross-chain infrastructure could directly put users’ funds and asset integrity at risk, especially for them. Distinctive real world assets.
Tenbin Labs also confirmed that the Chainlink CCIP migration complies with the Chainlink Data Standard. This accreditation establishes a consistent framework for how Tenbin assets are connected and value is transferred across chains.
With tGLD, tMXN, and tBRL now operating under CCIP, the platform is positioned to scale its multi-chain distribution under a unified, auditable security model.
